<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/</link>
	<description>Musings on technology, management, books, writing, and whatever else piques my interest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Monis Iqbal</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Monis Iqbal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 11:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-509</guid>
		<description>I too think that printed books won&#039;t end until the end of this world but yes their influence will. 
I know it&#039;s not relevant but somehow this reminds me of the movie &#039;Equilibrium&#039; where arts was cherished by only those who &#039;felt&#039; and had emotions.
I think printed material will take the form of arts. In our technical domains we easily see e-books or material on internet surpass the published material by a big margin.
.-= Monis Iqbal´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://monisiqbal.blogspot.com/2009/12/impact-of-nosql-movement-on-datastore.html&quot;&gt;Impact of NOSQL movement on the datastore vendors&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too think that printed books won&#8217;t end until the end of this world but yes their influence will.<br />
I know it&#8217;s not relevant but somehow this reminds me of the movie &#8216;Equilibrium&#8217; where arts was cherished by only those who &#8216;felt&#8217; and had emotions.<br />
I think printed material will take the form of arts. In our technical domains we easily see e-books or material on internet surpass the published material by a big margin.<br />
.-= Monis Iqbal´s last blog ..<a href="http://monisiqbal.blogspot.com/2009/12/impact-of-nosql-movement-on-datastore.html">Impact of NOSQL movement on the datastore vendors</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philsimon</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>philsimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 08:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-520</guid>
		<description>[New Post] The Future of Reading - via @twitoaster http://philsimonsystems.com/blog/wri...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[New Post] The Future of Reading &#8211; via @twitoaster <a href="http://philsimonsystems.com/blog/wri.." rel="nofollow">http://philsimonsystems.com/blog/wri..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Reading, Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Reading, Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-216</guid>
		<description>[...] on 12. Jan, 2010 Categories: Misc. Technology, Misc. Writing I recently posted on The Future of Reading, a topic that stirred a good bit of debate. In this post, I return to the topic technology and  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on 12. Jan, 2010 Categories: Misc. Technology, Misc. Writing I recently posted on The Future of Reading, a topic that stirred a good bit of debate. In this post, I return to the topic technology and  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philsimon</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>philsimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Check out Jim Harris&#039; blog and video response:

http://www.ocdqblog.com/home/will-people-still-read-in-the-future.html?lastPage=true&amp;postSubmitted=true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Jim Harris&#8217; blog and video response:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ocdqblog.com/home/will-people-still-read-in-the-future.html?lastPage=true&#038;postSubmitted=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.ocdqblog.com/home/will-people-still-read-in-the-future.html?lastPage=true&#038;postSubmitted=true</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wodek Szemberg</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Wodek Szemberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-192</guid>
		<description>The cultural shift that is difficult to guage is the extent to which the disappearance of the singular book represents a major step towards  a post-biblical society.  When more and more of us read screens rather than pages, we are saying goodbye to the singular book which, however tawdry, had one thing in common with the Bible - the original printed book – two covers. Between the two covers writers tried to offer a facsimile of completeness. No two covers, no completeness.  
Are the e-readers which  will contain  many books just a technological manifestation of the post-modernist  declaration that meta-narratives are over and done with?

These kinds of questions led me to a producing am hour long discussion about the future of reading. Here is a link  http://bit.ly/8Qqv3O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cultural shift that is difficult to guage is the extent to which the disappearance of the singular book represents a major step towards  a post-biblical society.  When more and more of us read screens rather than pages, we are saying goodbye to the singular book which, however tawdry, had one thing in common with the Bible &#8211; the original printed book – two covers. Between the two covers writers tried to offer a facsimile of completeness. No two covers, no completeness.<br />
Are the e-readers which  will contain  many books just a technological manifestation of the post-modernist  declaration that meta-narratives are over and done with?</p>
<p>These kinds of questions led me to a producing am hour long discussion about the future of reading. Here is a link  <a href="http://bit.ly/8Qqv3O" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8Qqv3O</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I could use the flying car to battle Route 1. I bet the English Majors will finally have high paying jobs once this takes place.. or not. Probably not. English will be a thing of the past. The new major will be Technological Audio &amp; Grunting. Now, what will that class be like? : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could use the flying car to battle Route 1. I bet the English Majors will finally have high paying jobs once this takes place.. or not. Probably not. English will be a thing of the past. The new major will be Technological Audio &amp; Grunting. Now, what will that class be like? : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-190</guid>
		<description>A point that I didn&#039;t make despite two previous and verbose comments is that for me the real question isn&#039;t &quot;what is the future of reading&quot; but instead:

Will people still read in the future?

So far it appears that everyone (myself included) who has commented is someone who likes to read.

However, if you are not someone, to paraphrase Brian, who sees an adventure awaiting you in a 500 page novel, then you don&#039;t care if it is a printed book or a e-book - you aren&#039;t going to read it.

So, yes, between us readers, some of us will not exchange our personal tactile relationship with printed books for an e-reader made of the finest plastic, glass, or metal, and equipped with all the bells and whistles of the latest technology.

But much more importantly, e-readers aren&#039;t going to make non-readers want to read.

I am arguing that there is a declining interest in reading in general throughout society.  And I see this interest declining rapidly across current generation gaps, and dropping even more dramatically in the coming decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A point that I didn&#8217;t make despite two previous and verbose comments is that for me the real question isn&#8217;t &#8220;what is the future of reading&#8221; but instead:</p>
<p>Will people still read in the future?</p>
<p>So far it appears that everyone (myself included) who has commented is someone who likes to read.</p>
<p>However, if you are not someone, to paraphrase Brian, who sees an adventure awaiting you in a 500 page novel, then you don&#8217;t care if it is a printed book or a e-book &#8211; you aren&#8217;t going to read it.</p>
<p>So, yes, between us readers, some of us will not exchange our personal tactile relationship with printed books for an e-reader made of the finest plastic, glass, or metal, and equipped with all the bells and whistles of the latest technology.</p>
<p>But much more importantly, e-readers aren&#8217;t going to make non-readers want to read.</p>
<p>I am arguing that there is a declining interest in reading in general throughout society.  And I see this interest declining rapidly across current generation gaps, and dropping even more dramatically in the coming decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I think Pogue is right on.  Technology is additive of some sort of value.  It&#039;s the peoples decision where the old technology is still useful.... whether it retains some value that the new technology does not/cannot replace.

For example....
Paper books have a personal tactile relationship with a user that cannot be replaced by plastic, glass and metal.  The feeling a reader gets as they are holding the slim first 10 pages of a 500 page novel... the aventure that awaits them.  This is something that cannot be replaced by a display screen &quot;page 5 of 543&quot;.  That is a value the old tech of printed books will and likely always will retain over new tech options.

As per your example of a Walkman.  The reason you and nobody else will be out to buy these is because it retains no intrinsic usable values that aren&#039;t vastly improved on by newer tech.

Sames reason why some audiophiles keep a turntable and their old vinyl....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Pogue is right on.  Technology is additive of some sort of value.  It&#8217;s the peoples decision where the old technology is still useful&#8230;. whether it retains some value that the new technology does not/cannot replace.</p>
<p>For example&#8230;.<br />
Paper books have a personal tactile relationship with a user that cannot be replaced by plastic, glass and metal.  The feeling a reader gets as they are holding the slim first 10 pages of a 500 page novel&#8230; the aventure that awaits them.  This is something that cannot be replaced by a display screen &#8220;page 5 of 543&#8243;.  That is a value the old tech of printed books will and likely always will retain over new tech options.</p>
<p>As per your example of a Walkman.  The reason you and nobody else will be out to buy these is because it retains no intrinsic usable values that aren&#8217;t vastly improved on by newer tech.</p>
<p>Sames reason why some audiophiles keep a turntable and their old vinyl&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Whitesdale</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>James Whitesdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-188</guid>
		<description>I really hope that we don&#039;t see the end of books. I like holding one in my hand and would hate to have to look at screens more than I already do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope that we don&#8217;t see the end of books. I like holding one in my hand and would hate to have to look at screens more than I already do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.philsimonsystems.com/blog/writing/publishing-writing-blog/future-of-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philsimonsystems.com/?p=1931#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Oh well, it was simply a matter of time before Graham finally realized how very wrong I can be.  :-)

After my initial comment, you might be surprised to learn that I neither currently have an e-reader, nor do I plan to buy one anytime soon.

I am, in fact, surrounded by stacks of printed books.  I could probably start my own book store – or, at the very least, my own eBay account for selling used books.

However, I am not a total hypocrite – despite my copious amounts of free time, I often struggle to read all of the printed books I buy.

For example, I am a fan of Chris Anderson and own copies of both “The Long Tail” and “Free” – but I haven’t read either book – and I am not sure if I ever will.  I have read so many magazine articles and blog posts (including Anderson’s) as well as seen so many interviews about the books, that I already know their core messages.

There are currently six printed books waiting to be read on my nightstand that I have queued to read before even considering to read Anderson’s books – and that doesn’t count the book I am currently reading, which technically makes seven.

And I would be willing bet Phil a Coke (even though I prefer Pepsi) that I will buy more printed books before I finish reading half of my current queue – and that some of the new books will be prioritized above the existing ones – meaning another author’s work may join Anderson’s book in the stack of books I own but haven’t read and might never read.

Maybe I am simply a book collector and not a book reader?

However, I still stand by my predictions above – I believe that before the end of this century &quot;we&quot; will see the end of printed books.

But, the end of the century is 90 years away, and like Graham said, neither of &quot;us&quot; will be around to see who’s right.  But if history is any indication, probably neither of us is right.

After all, we still don’t have any flying cars, personal jet packs, robot servants, or holodecks.

So, it’s a safe bet that future generations will have a good laugh about all of our predictions.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well, it was simply a matter of time before Graham finally realized how very wrong I can be.  <img src='http://www.philsimonsystems.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>After my initial comment, you might be surprised to learn that I neither currently have an e-reader, nor do I plan to buy one anytime soon.</p>
<p>I am, in fact, surrounded by stacks of printed books.  I could probably start my own book store – or, at the very least, my own eBay account for selling used books.</p>
<p>However, I am not a total hypocrite – despite my copious amounts of free time, I often struggle to read all of the printed books I buy.</p>
<p>For example, I am a fan of Chris Anderson and own copies of both “The Long Tail” and “Free” – but I haven’t read either book – and I am not sure if I ever will.  I have read so many magazine articles and blog posts (including Anderson’s) as well as seen so many interviews about the books, that I already know their core messages.</p>
<p>There are currently six printed books waiting to be read on my nightstand that I have queued to read before even considering to read Anderson’s books – and that doesn’t count the book I am currently reading, which technically makes seven.</p>
<p>And I would be willing bet Phil a Coke (even though I prefer Pepsi) that I will buy more printed books before I finish reading half of my current queue – and that some of the new books will be prioritized above the existing ones – meaning another author’s work may join Anderson’s book in the stack of books I own but haven’t read and might never read.</p>
<p>Maybe I am simply a book collector and not a book reader?</p>
<p>However, I still stand by my predictions above – I believe that before the end of this century &#8220;we&#8221; will see the end of printed books.</p>
<p>But, the end of the century is 90 years away, and like Graham said, neither of &#8220;us&#8221; will be around to see who’s right.  But if history is any indication, probably neither of us is right.</p>
<p>After all, we still don’t have any flying cars, personal jet packs, robot servants, or holodecks.</p>
<p>So, it’s a safe bet that future generations will have a good laugh about all of our predictions.  <img src='http://www.philsimonsystems.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

